On Tuesday, January 22, 2019 12:19:57 AM CET Sinan Kaya wrote:
> After 'commit 5d32a66541c4 ("PCI/ACPI: Allow ACPI to be built without
> CONFIG_PCI set")' dependencies on CONFIG_PCI that previously were
> satisfied implicitly through dependencies on CONFIG_ACPI have to be
> specified directly.
>
> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM
> Depends on [n]: I2C [=y] && HAS_IOMEM [=y] && (ACPI [=y] && COMMON_CLK [=n] || !ACPI [=y])
> Selected by [y]:
> - MFD_TPS68470 [=y] && HAS_IOMEM [=y] && ACPI [=y] && I2C [=y]=y
>
> MFD_TPS68470 is an ACPI only device and selects I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM.
> I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM does not have any configuration today for ACPI
> support without CONFIG_PCI set.
>
> For sake of a quick fix this introduces a new mandatory dependency to the
> driver which may survive without it. Otherwise we need to revisit the
> driver architecture to address this properly.
>
> Fixes: 5d32a66541c46 ("PCI/ACPI: Allow ACPI to be built without CONFIG_PCI set")
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> index f461460a2aeb..76f9909cf396 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> @@ -1419,7 +1419,7 @@ config MFD_TPS65217
>
> config MFD_TPS68470
> bool "TI TPS68470 Power Management / LED chips"
> - depends on ACPI && I2C=y
> + depends on ACPI && PCI && I2C=y
> select MFD_CORE
> select REGMAP_I2C
> select I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM
>
Is anyone taking this or should I?
