On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 6:49 PM Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This driver is both a platform and PCI driver. Hide PCI specific pieces
> when CONFIG_PCI is unset.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
> index 284cf2c5a8fd..b84a475a1162 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
> @@ -374,6 +374,7 @@ static int int3401_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
> static irqreturn_t proc_thermal_pci_msi_irq(int irq, void *devid)
> {
> struct proc_thermal_device *proc_priv;
> @@ -482,6 +483,7 @@ static struct pci_driver proc_thermal_pci_driver = {
> .remove = proc_thermal_pci_remove,
> .id_table = proc_thermal_pci_ids,
> };
> +#endif
>
> static const struct acpi_device_id int3401_device_ids[] = {
> {"INT3401", 0},
> @@ -505,16 +507,18 @@ static int __init proc_thermal_init(void)
> ret = platform_driver_register(&int3401_driver);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> -
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
> ret = pci_register_driver(&proc_thermal_pci_driver);
> -
> +#endif
> return ret;
> }
>
> static void __exit proc_thermal_exit(void)
> {
> platform_driver_unregister(&int3401_driver);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
> pci_unregister_driver(&proc_thermal_pci_driver);
> +#endif
> }
>
> module_init(proc_thermal_init);
Can you actually test this driver with your new #ifdef stuff and with
CONFIG_PCI unset?
Have you really test it in that configuration?
If not, you shouldn't even post this patch.
Please make the driver depend on PCI.
