Hi,
On 07-12-18 12:39, Mika Westerberg wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 02:47:03PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
DSI LCD panels describe an initialization sequence in the Video BIOS
Tables using so called MIPI sequences. One possible element in these
sequences is a PMIC specific element of 15 bytes.
Although this is not really an ACPI opregion, the ACPI opregion code is the
closest thing we have. We need to have support for these PMIC specific MIPI
sequence elements somwhere. Since we already instantiate a special platform
device for Intel PMICs for the ACPI PMIC OpRegion handler to bind to,
with PMIC specific implementations of the OpRegion, the handling of MIPI
sequence PMIC elements fits very well in the ACPI PMIC OpRegion code.
This commit adds a new intel_soc_pmic_exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element()
function, which is to be backed by a PMIC specific
exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element callback. This function will be called by the
i915 code to execture MIPI sequence PMIC elements.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic.h | 1 +
include/linux/mfd/intel_soc_pmic.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic.c b/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic.c
index ca18e0d23df9..0d96ca08bb79 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/acpi.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/intel_soc_pmic.h>
#include <linux/regmap.h>
#include <acpi/acpi_lpat.h>
#include "intel_pmic.h"
@@ -36,6 +37,8 @@ struct intel_pmic_opregion {
struct intel_pmic_regs_handler_ctx ctx;
};
+static struct intel_pmic_opregion *intel_pmic_opregion;
+
static int pmic_get_reg_bit(int address, struct pmic_table *table,
int count, int *reg, int *bit)
{
@@ -304,6 +307,7 @@ int intel_pmic_install_opregion_handler(struct device *dev, acpi_handle handle,
}
opregion->data = d;
+ intel_pmic_opregion = opregion;
return 0;
out_remove_thermal_handler:
@@ -319,3 +323,24 @@ int intel_pmic_install_opregion_handler(struct device *dev, acpi_handle handle,
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(intel_pmic_install_opregion_handler);
+
Since this is exported, please add kernel-doc here.
Done for v3.
+void intel_soc_pmic_exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element(const u8 *data)
+{
+ struct intel_pmic_opregion_data *d;
+
+ if (!intel_pmic_opregion) {
+ pr_warn("%s: No PMIC registered\n", __func__);
+ return;
Why not return error codes instead?
Other ops in struct intel_pmic_opregion_data seem to do so.
Ok, I've changed the return-type to int and I'm returning error
codes for v3 of this patch-set.
Regards,
Hans
+ }
+
+ d = intel_pmic_opregion->data;
+ if (!d->exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element) {
+ pr_warn("%s: Not implemented\n", __func__);
+ return;
Ditto.
+ }
+
+ mutex_lock(&intel_pmic_opregion->lock);
+ d->exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element(intel_pmic_opregion->regmap, data);
+ mutex_unlock(&intel_pmic_opregion->lock);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(intel_soc_pmic_exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element);
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic.h b/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic.h
index 095afc96952e..5a7bb33d046a 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic.h
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic.h
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ struct intel_pmic_opregion_data {
int (*update_aux)(struct regmap *r, int reg, int raw_temp);
int (*get_policy)(struct regmap *r, int reg, int bit, u64 *value);
int (*update_policy)(struct regmap *r, int reg, int bit, int enable);
+ void (*exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element)(struct regmap *r, const u8 *data);
struct pmic_table *power_table;
int power_table_count;
struct pmic_table *thermal_table;
diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/intel_soc_pmic.h b/include/linux/mfd/intel_soc_pmic.h
index ed1dfba5e5f9..ce04ad7d4b6c 100644
--- a/include/linux/mfd/intel_soc_pmic.h
+++ b/include/linux/mfd/intel_soc_pmic.h
@@ -26,4 +26,6 @@ struct intel_soc_pmic {
struct device *dev;
};
+void intel_soc_pmic_exec_mipi_pmic_seq_element(const u8 *data);
+
#endif /* __INTEL_SOC_PMIC_H__ */
--
2.19.2
