[...] >>> >>> + if (type == MEMORY_BLOCK_NONE) >>> + return -EINVAL; >> >> No one will pass in this value. Can we omit this check for now? > >I could move it to patch nr 2 I guess, but as I introduce >MEMORY_BLOCK_NONE here it made sense to keep it in here. > Yes, this make sense to me now. >(and I think at least for now it makes sense to not squash patch 1 and >2, to easier discuss the new user interface/concept introduced in this >patch). > >Thanks! > >-- > >Thanks, > >David / dhildenb -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me
