On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 11:07:19AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 05:08:52PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Besides current two users one more is coming. Definitely makes sense to
> > introduce a helper.
> Since this is exported, you may want to add kernel-doc here.
OK.
> > +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> > @@ -1054,6 +1054,17 @@ static inline int acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(struct acpi_device *adev, int index)
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C)
> > +bool i2c_acpi_get_i2c_resource(struct acpi_resource *ares,
> > + struct acpi_resource_i2c_serialbus **i2c);
> > +#else
> > +static inline bool i2c_acpi_get_i2c_resource(struct acpi_resource *ares,
> > + struct acpi_resource_i2c_serialbus **i2c)
> > +{
> > + return false;
> > +}
>
> I think this belongs to include/linux/i2c.h where we have
> i2c_acpi_find_bus_speed() and friends.
I don't think so. It operates on top of data structures defined solely under
ACPI umbrella. If I move them to i2c.h it would look inconsistent.
Perhaps you would like to have different namespace for it (like acpi_i2c_ ?).
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
