On Thursday, November 8, 2018 5:51:52 PM CET Heikki Krogerus wrote: > Hi, > > This is the second version of my proposal for this helper. The > first version can be checked here: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/5/326 > > In order to support also ACPI properly, I decided to change the API. > The function fwnode_name() is now fwnode_get_name(), and instead of > returning pointer to the name, the function copies it to a buffer. I > did that because acpica does not offer a way to get a pointer to the > node name, and the name is clearly expected to be accessed only with > the namespace lock held. > > I think this is better approach in any case. It will also solve the > problem of getting rid of the unit-address part from DT node names. > > Let me know what you guys think. > > -- > heikki > > > Heikki Krogerus (4): > device property: Introduce fwnode_get_name() > ACPI: property: Add acpi_fwnode_name() > of/property: Add of_fwnode_name() > device property: Drop get_named_child_node callback > > drivers/acpi/property.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ > drivers/base/property.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > drivers/of/property.c | 26 ++++++++++-------------- > include/linux/fwnode.h | 6 +++--- > include/linux/property.h | 2 ++ > 5 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) > > I will be expecting at least one more iteration of this series to address the Rob's comments. Thanks, Rafael
