Hi, On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 10:14:49AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > I would prefer that we had something like of_node_name_get() function > > that of_fwnode_get_name() could simply call. I don't know how you want > > that implemented, but I'm expecting you will implement something like > > that in any case once you start removing that ->name member. I figured > > that at that point we can update of_fwnode_get_name() as well. > > I don't plan to implement anything like that. Here's what I'm planning: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git/log/?h=dt/testing > > Which is eliminating the need to access .name by: using %pOFn (mostly > in 4.20), using of_node_name_eq() wrapper, or using full_name instead. > The last case generally is cases where the name is not important such > as request_irq() or irq_chip.name. OK. Thanks for the explanation. thanks, -- heikki
