On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 04:08:01PM +0100, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> From: Neil Leeder <nleeder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add support for the SMMU Performance Monitor Counter Group
> information from ACPI. This is in preparation for its use
> in the SMMUv3 PMU driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Leeder <nleeder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> index 08f26db..b979c86 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> @@ -356,7 +356,8 @@ static struct acpi_iort_node *iort_node_get_id(struct acpi_iort_node *node,
> if (map->flags & ACPI_IORT_ID_SINGLE_MAPPING) {
> if (node->type == ACPI_IORT_NODE_NAMED_COMPONENT ||
> node->type == ACPI_IORT_NODE_PCI_ROOT_COMPLEX ||
> - node->type == ACPI_IORT_NODE_SMMU_V3) {
> + node->type == ACPI_IORT_NODE_SMMU_V3 ||
> + node->type == ACPI_IORT_NODE_PMCG) {
> *id_out = map->output_base;
> return parent;
> }
> @@ -394,6 +395,8 @@ static int iort_get_id_mapping_index(struct acpi_iort_node *node)
> }
>
> return smmu->id_mapping_index;
> + case ACPI_IORT_NODE_PMCG:
> + return 0;
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -1309,6 +1312,50 @@ static bool __init arm_smmu_is_coherent(struct acpi_iort_node *node)
> return smmu->flags & ACPI_IORT_SMMU_COHERENT_WALK;
> }
>
> +static void __init arm_smmu_common_dma_configure(struct device *dev,
> + enum dev_dma_attr attr)
> +{
> + /* We expect the dma masks to be equivalent for all SMMUs set-ups */
> + dev->dma_mask = &dev->coherent_dma_mask;
> +
> + /* Configure DMA for the page table walker */
> + acpi_dma_configure(dev, attr);
> +}
It looks like we can't get rid of this acpi_dma_configure() call
given that the platform device we create has no ACPI companion
(and I am not looking forward to fabricating one to make the
code homogeneous :)).
Still, having two methods per IORT node type (dev_is_coherent() and
dev_dma_configure()) does not make much sense, we can merge it into one
I think.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
> +static int __init arm_smmu_v3_pmcg_count_resources(struct acpi_iort_node *node)
> +{
> + struct acpi_iort_pmcg *pmcg;
> +
> + /* Retrieve PMCG specific data */
> + pmcg = (struct acpi_iort_pmcg *)node->node_data;
> +
> + /*
> + * There are always 2 memory resources.
> + * If the overflow_gsiv is present then add that for a total of 3.
> + */
> + return pmcg->overflow_gsiv ? 3 : 2;
> +}
> +
> +static void __init arm_smmu_v3_pmcg_init_resources(struct resource *res,
> + struct acpi_iort_node *node)
> +{
> + struct acpi_iort_pmcg *pmcg;
> +
> + /* Retrieve PMCG specific data */
> + pmcg = (struct acpi_iort_pmcg *)node->node_data;
> +
> + res[0].start = pmcg->page0_base_address;
> + res[0].end = pmcg->page0_base_address + SZ_4K - 1;
> + res[0].flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
> + res[1].start = pmcg->page1_base_address;
> + res[1].end = pmcg->page1_base_address + SZ_4K - 1;
> + res[1].flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
> +
> + if (pmcg->overflow_gsiv)
> + acpi_iort_register_irq(pmcg->overflow_gsiv, "overflow",
> + ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE, &res[2]);
> +}
> +
> struct iort_dev_config {
> const char *name;
> int (*dev_init)(struct acpi_iort_node *node);
> @@ -1318,6 +1365,8 @@ struct iort_dev_config {
> struct acpi_iort_node *node);
> void (*dev_set_proximity)(struct device *dev,
> struct acpi_iort_node *node);
> + void (*dev_dma_configure)(struct device *dev,
> + enum dev_dma_attr attr);
> };
>
> static const struct iort_dev_config iort_arm_smmu_v3_cfg __initconst = {
> @@ -1326,23 +1375,34 @@ static const struct iort_dev_config iort_arm_smmu_v3_cfg __initconst = {
> .dev_count_resources = arm_smmu_v3_count_resources,
> .dev_init_resources = arm_smmu_v3_init_resources,
> .dev_set_proximity = arm_smmu_v3_set_proximity,
> + .dev_dma_configure = arm_smmu_common_dma_configure,
> };
>
> static const struct iort_dev_config iort_arm_smmu_cfg __initconst = {
> .name = "arm-smmu",
> .dev_is_coherent = arm_smmu_is_coherent,
> .dev_count_resources = arm_smmu_count_resources,
> - .dev_init_resources = arm_smmu_init_resources
> + .dev_init_resources = arm_smmu_init_resources,
> + .dev_dma_configure = arm_smmu_common_dma_configure,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct iort_dev_config iort_arm_smmu_v3_pmcg_cfg __initconst = {
> + .name = "arm-smmu-v3-pmu",
> + .dev_count_resources = arm_smmu_v3_pmcg_count_resources,
> + .dev_init_resources = arm_smmu_v3_pmcg_init_resources,
> };
>
> static __init const struct iort_dev_config *iort_get_dev_cfg(
> struct acpi_iort_node *node)
> {
> +
> switch (node->type) {
> case ACPI_IORT_NODE_SMMU_V3:
> return &iort_arm_smmu_v3_cfg;
> case ACPI_IORT_NODE_SMMU:
> return &iort_arm_smmu_cfg;
> + case ACPI_IORT_NODE_PMCG:
> + return &iort_arm_smmu_v3_pmcg_cfg;
> default:
> return NULL;
> }
> @@ -1398,12 +1458,6 @@ static int __init iort_add_platform_device(struct acpi_iort_node *node,
> if (ret)
> goto dev_put;
>
> - /*
> - * We expect the dma masks to be equivalent for
> - * all SMMUs set-ups
> - */
> - pdev->dev.dma_mask = &pdev->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
> -
> fwnode = iort_get_fwnode(node);
>
> if (!fwnode) {
> @@ -1413,11 +1467,11 @@ static int __init iort_add_platform_device(struct acpi_iort_node *node,
>
> pdev->dev.fwnode = fwnode;
>
> - attr = ops->dev_is_coherent && ops->dev_is_coherent(node) ?
> + if (ops->dev_dma_configure) {
> + attr = ops->dev_is_coherent && ops->dev_is_coherent(node) ?
> DEV_DMA_COHERENT : DEV_DMA_NON_COHERENT;
> -
> - /* Configure DMA for the page table walker */
> - acpi_dma_configure(&pdev->dev, attr);
> + ops->dev_dma_configure(&pdev->dev, attr);
> + }
>
> iort_set_device_domain(&pdev->dev, node);
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>
