Re: [PATCH 05/10] PCI: portdrv: Resume upon exit from system suspend if left runtime suspended

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 06:50:15PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> Currently we try to keep PCIe ports runtime suspended over system
> suspend if possible. This mostly happens when entering suspend-to-idle
> because there is no need to re-configure wake settings.
> 
> This causes problems if the parent port goes into D3cold and it gets
> resumed upon exit from system suspend. This may happen for example if
> the port is part of PCIe switch and the same switch is connected to a
> PCIe endpoint that needs to be resumed. The way exit from D3cold works
> according PCIe 4.0 spec 5.3.1.4.2 is that power is restored and cold
> reset is signaled. After this the device is in D0unitialized state
> keeping PME context if it supports wake from D3cold.
> 
> The problem occurs when a PCIe hotplug port is left suspended and the
> parent port goes into D3cold and back to D0, the port keeps its PME
> context but since everything else is reset back to defaults
> (D0unitialized) it is not set to detect hotplug events anymore.

We call pci_wakeup_bus() in __pci_start_power_transition() for this
reason.  Why isn't that sufficient in your use case?


> For this reason change the PCIe portdrv power management logic so that
> it is fine to keep the port runtime suspended over system suspend but it
> needs to be resumed upon exit to make sure it gets properly re-initialized.
> The custom ->prepare() hook with DPM_FLAG_SMART_PREPARE is needed
> because otherwise pci_pm_prepare() instructs the PM core to go directly
> to pci_pm_complete() on resume and this skips resuming the port.

On Macs, if no Thunderbolt device is attached, it is perfectly okay to
use direct complete and it is also perfectly okay to leave the entire
controller (including all its PCIe ports) in D3cold when coming out of
system sleep.  In fact it would be unnecessary and undesirable to
runtime resume the controller, it would just waste energy for no reason.

Can you make sure that ports stay runtime suspended after system sleep
in that case?

Thanks,

Lukas



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux