On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 1:17 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 10:31 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 12:32 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > -static struct pci_bus *pci_scan_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
> > > - struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata, struct list_head *resources)
> > > +void pcibios_scan_root(int busnum)
> > > {
> > > + struct pci_sysdata *sd;
> > > struct pci_host_bridge *bridge;
> > > int error;
> > >
> > > - bridge = pci_alloc_host_bridge(0);
> > > - if (!bridge)
> > > - return NULL;
> > > + bridge = pci_alloc_host_bridge(sizeof(sd));
> > > + if (!bridge) {
> > > + printk(KERN_ERR "PCI: OOM, skipping PCI bus %02x\n", busnum);
> > > + return;
> > > + }
> > > + sd = pci_host_bridge_priv(bridge);
> >
> > This looks fishy, as bridge->private is not set at this point AFAICS,
> > unless one of the previous patches changes that.
>
> bridge->private what comes after the bridge structure, and it's allocated
> by pci_alloc_host_bridge() passing the size of the structure we want
> for this private area.
I see, sorry for the noise.
