On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 10:23 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 12:33 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > @@ -909,8 +881,7 @@ struct pci_bus *acpi_pci_root_create(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
> > int ret, busnum = root->secondary.start;
> > struct acpi_device *device = root->device;
> > int node = acpi_get_node(device->handle);
> > - struct pci_bus *bus;
> > - struct pci_host_bridge *host_bridge;
> > + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge;
>
> Why "bridge" and not "host" or even something to stand for "root complex"?
>
> Or maybe it can still be "host_bridge"?
I did this for consistency with the naming in drivers/pci/probe.c,
which always declares the local variable as 'struct pci_host_bridge *bridge'.
It's easy to change here if you feel strongly about it (I don't).
Arnd
