Hi,
On 09-08-18 11:35, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Since commit 63347db0affa ("ACPI / scan: Use acpi_bus_get_status() to
initialize ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE devs") the status field of normal acpi_devices
gets set to 0 by acpi_bus_type_and_status() and filled with its actual
value later when acpi_add_single_object() calls acpi_bus_get_status().
This means that any acpi_match_device_ids() calls in between will always
fail with -ENOENT.
We already have a workaround for this, which temporary forces status to
ACPI_STA_DEFAULT in drivers/acpi/x86/utils.c: acpi_device_always_present()
and the next commit in this series adds another acpi_match_device_ids()
call between status being initialized as 0 and the acpi_bus_get_status()
call.
Rather then adding another workaround, this commit makes
acpi_bus_type_and_status() initialize status to ACPI_STA_DEFAULT, this is
safe to do as the only code looking at status between the initialization
and the acpi_bus_get_status() call is those acpi_match_device_ids() calls.
Note this does mean that we need to (re)set status to 0 in case the
acpi_bus_get_status() call fails.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v3:
-New patch in v3 of this patch-set
Changes in v4:
-This is not a fix for acpi_is_indirect_io_slave() as I thought at first,
acpi_is_indirect_io_slave() calls acpi_match_device_ids() on its parent
device, where status is already set properly. Rewrite the commit message
accordingly.
I've applied the v4 of this patch and I don't think there are any
changes from it here.
Correct, there were only changes to the 4th patch in the series.
As for the rest of the series I'll wait from comments from Wolfram and
the other reviewers.
Ok, note if you've taken patch 1 you may also want to take patch 3 which
is an ACPI code cleanup made possible by patch 1 and otherwise is
unrelated.
Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html