From: Lucas Rangit Magasweran <lucas.magasweran@xxxxxxxx> When battery state is not cached the module parameter cache_time is 0 and battery->update_time starts at 0. However, it set to jiffies in each call to acpi_battery_get_state() and should not be used to determine if a cache time is used. Using battery->update_time causes the evaluation of time_before() even though cache_time is 0. This is a minor issue as the behavior is still as expected. Even if kernel HZ was very slow and jiffies remained equal, the expected branch (false) would be taken because time_before() is used instead of time_before_eq(). Signed-off-by: Lucas Rangit Magasweran <lucas.magasweran@xxxxxxxx> --- drivers/acpi/battery.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c index d79ad84..f88bc9f 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c @@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ static int acpi_battery_get_state(struct acpi_battery *battery) if (!acpi_battery_present(battery)) return 0; - if (battery->update_time && + if (cache_time && time_before(jiffies, battery->update_time + msecs_to_jiffies(cache_time))) return 0; -- 2.7.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html