On 04/07/18 10:32, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Srinath Mannam > <srinath.mannam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Sudeep, Andy, >> >> Yes, This patch is to get of_device_id and then fetch data pointer. >> >> To add ACPI support in multiple drivers which are device-tree based >> and has list of of_device_ids, by using this function >> very minimal changes and can avoid acpi_device_id list in the driver. >> I will send driver changes where this function used to add ACPI >> support in following patches. >> >> Below are the changes added to add ACPI support in sdhci iproc driver >> using this function. > > So, did you get an ACPI ID for it? > That's how proper ACPI support should be done. > > P.S. What you are trying to do is being discussed with Nikolaus in [1]. > I have to NAK your approach in any case. Sorry. > +1 on NACK for this and anything else that abuse PRP0001 as a short cut approach. -- Regards, Sudeep -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
