On 25/06/18 17:37, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Rafael J. Wysocki (2018-06-16 08:50:18) >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 7:43 PM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Is this for clk_enable/disable? What about clk_set_rate() or >>> clk_set_phase()? Is ACPI's AML taking care of that? >> >> That's for clk_enable/disable AFAICS. >> >> AML doesn't manage device performance states at all. > > Alright. We may need to add a better way for device drivers to get > handles to clk pointers on ACPI firmware so they can change frequencies > or phase, etc. Is there any specific usecase/device needing this in the kernel ? SPI slaves ? > Right now it's all through clkdev and it looks to be > mostly based on string matching of connection names instead of > associating clks with devices. > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Regards, Sudeep -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
