On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 08:18:18PM +0800, Yisheng Xie wrote: > Zhou reported a bug on Hisilicon arm64 D06 platform with 64KB page size: > > [ 2.470908] kernel BUG at lib/ioremap.c:72! > [ 2.475079] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP > [ 2.480551] Modules linked in: > [ 2.483594] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.16.0-rc7-00062-g0b41260-dirty #23 > [ 2.491756] Hardware name: Huawei D06/D06, BIOS Hisilicon D06 UEFI Nemo 2.0 RC0 - B120 03/23/2018 > [ 2.500614] pstate: 80c00009 (Nzcv daif +PAN +UAO) > [ 2.505395] pc : ioremap_page_range+0x268/0x36c > [ 2.509912] lr : pci_remap_iospace+0xe4/0x100 > [...] > [ 2.603733] Call trace: > [ 2.606168] ioremap_page_range+0x268/0x36c > [ 2.610337] pci_remap_iospace+0xe4/0x100 > [ 2.614334] acpi_pci_probe_root_resources+0x1d4/0x214 > [ 2.619460] pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources+0x18/0xa8 > [ 2.624585] acpi_pci_root_create+0x98/0x214 > [ 2.628843] pci_acpi_scan_root+0x124/0x20c > [ 2.633013] acpi_pci_root_add+0x224/0x494 > [ 2.637096] acpi_bus_attach+0xf8/0x200 > [ 2.640918] acpi_bus_attach+0x98/0x200 > [ 2.644740] acpi_bus_attach+0x98/0x200 > [ 2.648562] acpi_bus_scan+0x48/0x9c > [ 2.652125] acpi_scan_init+0x104/0x268 > [ 2.655948] acpi_init+0x308/0x374 > [ 2.659337] do_one_initcall+0x48/0x14c > [ 2.663160] kernel_init_freeable+0x19c/0x250 > [ 2.667504] kernel_init+0x10/0x100 > [ 2.670979] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 > > The cause is the size of PCI IO resource is 32KB, which is 4K aligned but > not 64KB aligned, however, ioremap_page_range() request the range as page > aligned or it will trigger a BUG_ON() on ioremap_pte_range() it calls, as > ioremap_pte_range increase the addr by PAGE_SIZE, which makes addr != end > until trigger BUG_ON, if its incoming end is not page aligned. More detail > trace is as following: > > ioremap_page_range > -> ioremap_p4d_range > -> ioremap_p4d_range > -> ioremap_pud_range > -> ioremap_pmd_range > -> ioremap_pte_range > > This patch avoid panic by return -EINVAL if vaddr or resource size is not > page aligned. > > Reported-by: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Xiaojun Tan <tanxiaojun@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v3: > - pci_remap_iospace() sanitize its arguments instead - per Rafael > > v2: > - Let the caller of ioremap_page_range() align the request by PAGE_SIZE - per Toshi > > drivers/pci/pci.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c > index dbfe7c4..0eb0381 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c > @@ -3544,6 +3544,9 @@ int pci_remap_iospace(const struct resource *res, phys_addr_t phys_addr) > if (res->end > IO_SPACE_LIMIT) > return -EINVAL; > > + if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(vaddr) || !PAGE_ALIGNED(resource_size(res))) > + return -EINVAL; Most other callers of ioremap_page_range() are in the ioremap() path, and they align phys_addr themselves. In some cases that results in a mapping that covers more than necessary. For instance, see the function comment at the x86 version of __ioremap_caller(). Is there any reason we couldn't similarly align vaddr and phys_addr here? The acpi_pci_probe_root_resources() path you mention above basically ignores the errors you're returning. Your patches will avoid the panic, which is an improvement, but I/O port space will not work, and I don't see anything that gives the user a hint about why not. If we could align vaddr and phys_addr (and possibly map more than necessary), I/O port space would still work. > return ioremap_page_range(vaddr, vaddr + resource_size(res), phys_addr, > pgprot_device(PAGE_KERNEL)); > #else > -- > 1.7.12.4 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
