On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 01:41:09PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 05:24:04PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 09:11:18AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 07:01:55PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > > When a system is using native PCIe hotplug for Thunderbolt it will be > > > > only present in the system when there is a device connected. This pretty > > > > much follows the BIOS assisted hotplug behaviour. > > > > > > > > Thunderbolt host router integrated PCIe switch has two additional PCIe > > > > downstream bridges that lead to NHI (Thunderbolt host controller) and xHCI > > > > (USB 3 host controller) respectively. These downstream bridges are not > > > > marked being hotplug capable. Reason for that is to preserve resources. > > > > Otherwise the OS would distribute remaining resources between all > > > > downstream bridges making these two bridges consume precious resources > > > > of the actual hotplug bridges. > > > > > > > > Now, because these two bridges are not marked being hotplug capable the OS > > > > will not enable hotplug interrupt for them either and will not receive > > > > interrupt when devices behind them are hot-added. Solution to this is > > > > that the BIOS sends ACPI Notify() to the root port let the OS know it > > > > needs to rescan for added and/or removed devices. > > > > > > > > Here is how the mechanism is supposed to work when a Thunderbolt > > > > endpoint is connected to one of the ports. In case of a standard USB-C > > > > device only the xHCI is hot-added otherwise steps are the same. > > > > > > > > 1. Initially there is only the PCIe root port that is controlled by > > > > the pciehp driver > > > > > > > > 00:1b.0 (Hotplug+) -- > > > > > > > > 2. Then we get native PCIe hotplug interrupt and once it is handled the > > > > topology looks as following > > > > > > > > 00:1b.0 (Hotplug+) -- 01:00.0 --+- 02:00.0 -- > > > > +- 02:01.0 (HotPlug+) > > > > \- 02:02.0 -- > > > > > > Help me out here. In PCIe terms, I assume we basically hot-added this > > > switch: > > > > > > 01:00.0 Switch Upstream port > > > 02:00.0 Switch Downstream Port > > > 02:01.0 Switch Downstream Port > > > 02:02.0 Switch Downstream Port > > > > > > Only 02:01.0 has PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_HPC set. We can assign secondary bus > > > number space to all the downstream ports, but there are currently no > > > devices below any of them. Well, duh, that's exactly what you said > > > below: > > > > > > > 3. Bridges 02:00.0 and 02:02.0 are not marked as hotplug capable and > > > > they don't have anything behind them currently. Bridge 02:01.0 is > > > > hotplug capable and used for extending the topology. At this point > > > > the required PCIe devices are enabled and ACPI Notify() is sent to > > > > the root port. The resulting topology is expected to look like > > > > > > > > 00:1b.0 (Hotplug+) -- 01:00.0 --+- 02:00.0 -- Thunderbolt host controller > > > > +- 02:01.0 (HotPlug+) > > > > \- 02:02.0 -- xHCI host controller > > > > > > > > > > I guess this means we should ultimately end up with these new devices: > > > > > > 03:00.0 Thunderbolt host controller > > > 39:00.0 xHCI host controller > > > > That's right. > > > > > (Can you send "lspci -vv" output so I can see the names, device types, > > > etc? I'm still trying to map the Thunderbolt "host router", NHI, etc > > > terminology into PCIe concepts.) > > > > The full lspci -vv is here: > > > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=275703 > > Thanks, that's quite an intimidating PCIe tree with several levels of > Thunderbolt stuff. > > If you disconnect/reconnect the cable (or I guess the add-in card at > the top level) closest to the root port, does this all work correctly? Yes it does. > I assume the pciehp hotplug adds just the top-level switch (01:00.0), > then an ACPI Notify() adds the NHI and xHCI and configures the > tunnels, then another pciehp event adds the next-level switch, and > another Notify() sets up more tunnels, etc, etc? It is the firmware running on the Thunderbolt host router that sets up the tunnels and triggers standard PCIe hotplug once it is done. Notify() is only used to bring in those two controllers to the first PCIe switch. Reason for using Notify() here is that then we don't need to mark the two downstream ports leading to xHCI and NHI to be hotplug ports and thus the OS does not spread the available bus space/resources to those ports. If you keep connecting more devices then standard PCIe hotplug is used and there will be no Notify(). > > Just to clarify: > > > > Thunderbolt host router = The whole Thunderbolt add-in-card, including > > PCIe switch, Thunderbolt host controller > > (NHI) and USB 3.0 host controller (xHCI). > > I assume the main reason for using ACPI hotplug here is because Linux > doesn't know how to set up the Thunderbolt tunnels, so some sort of > firmware has to do it? Firmware does it regardless of what OS is running (with the exception of Apple hardware, of course). Once it establishes a tunnel a standard PCIe hotplug event is triggered. ACPI hotplug is only used to bring in those two devices of the host router. You might wonder why they aren't all handled by the pciehp and the reason is that if you only connect USB-C device (not TBT) ACPI hotplug only finds xHCI since you don't need the NHI for that. > How does the BIOS figure out when to send the Notify()? If the host > router is built into the motherboard, I can see how there might be > some path for BIOS to notice a device being connected to the > Thunderbolt host router, and then it could power up the host router > (causing a pciehp hot-add), and then send the Notify(). There is a GPIO on the AIC that is wired to trigger ACPI GPE and the GPE handler does the Notify(). > But if this is actually a separate add-in card, does that mean the > tunnel setup has to be done via the option ROM somehow? It is done in the firmware running on the host router (AIC). > Or does the add-in card only work on systems that already have > Thunderbolt support in their BIOS? If so, how does this work if the > card is hot-added? Do we add the switch via pciehp, and something > else in Linux tells ACPI to issue the Notify()? The BIOS needs to have Thunderbolt support built in but I think that is pretty "generic" and that is one of the reasons the Notify() is send to the root port and not to the exact downstream ports where those two controllers (xHCI, NHI) are connected to. I don't know all the details but I think it works like that. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
