On Mon, 2018-05-21 at 12:07 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Sun, 2018-05-20 at 15:28 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Some types of interrupts are retrieved in i2c_device_probe() because > > getting them might fail with -EPROBE_DEFER. > > > > So far we've always assumed the first IRQ (index 0) in the firmware- > > node > > is the one we want. > > > > At least with ACPI enumerated i2c-clients in some cases the > > firmware- > > node > > is shared between multiple i2c-clients so we need to be able to > > specify > > the index rather then hardcoding it at 0. > > > > This commit adds a new fwnode_irq_index member to i2c_board_info and > > i2c_client which allows specifying the index. > > > > FWIW, > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > P.S. I would go with 'unsigned int' for the index. Ah, it seems it is needed to be -1 in some cases. Discard my comment. -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Intel Finland Oy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
