Re: [PATCH v3 07/12] ACPI / APEI: Make the nmi_fixmap_idx per-ghes to allow multiple in_nmi() users

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Borislav,

On 16/05/18 12:05, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 09:45:01AM +0100, James Morse wrote:
>> NOTIFY_NMI is x86's NMI, arm doesn't have anything that behaves in the same way,
>> so doesn't use it. The equivalent notifications with NMI-like behaviour are:
>> * SEA (synchronous external abort)
>> * SEI (SError Interrupt)
>> * SDEI (software delegated exception interface)
> > Oh wow, three! :)

The first two overload existing architectural behavior, the third improves all
this with a third standard option. Its the standard story!


>> Alternatively, I can put the fixmap-page and spinlock in some 'struct
>> ghes_notification' that only the NMI-like struct-ghes need. This is just moving
>> the indirection up a level, but it does pair the lock with the thing it locks,
>> and gets rid of assigning spinlock pointers.
> 
> Keeping the lock and what it protects in one place certainly sounds
> better.

Yup, I was about to post a v4...


> I guess you could so something like this:
> 
> struct ghes_fixmap {
>  union {
>   raw_spinlock_t nmi_lock;
>    spinlock_t lock;
>  };

(heh, spinlock_t already contains a raw_spinlock_t)

>  void __iomem *(map)(struct ghes_fixmap *);
> };
> 
> and assign the proper ghes_ioremap function to ->map.

The function pointer is a problem because SDEI is effectively two notification
methods. Critical can interrupt normal. I'd really like to keep the differences
buried in the SDEI driver.

v4 has a separate structure for the fixmap-entry and lock, which
ghes_copy_tofrom_phys() reaches into if in_nmi().


> The spin_lock_irqsave() call in ghes_copy_tofrom_phys() is kinda
> questionable. Because we should have disabled interrupts so that you can
> do
> 
> spin_lock(map->lock);

I thought this was for the polled driver, but that must be backed by an
interrupt too...

linux/timer.h has:
|  * An irqsafe timer is executed with IRQ disabled and it's safe to wait for
|  * the completion of the running instance from IRQ handlers, for example,
|  * by calling del_timer_sync().
|  *
|  * Note: The irq disabled callback execution is a special case for
|  * workqueue locking issues. It's not meant for executing random crap
|  * with interrupts disabled. Abuse is monitored!

This irq-disable behaviour is controlled by the flags field:
| #define TIMER_DEFERRABLE	0x00080000
| #define TIMER_IRQSAFE		0x00200000

and ghes_probe() does this:
| timer_setup(&ghes->timer, ghes_poll_func, TIMER_DEFERRABLE);

So I think the ghes_poll_func() can be called with IRQs unmasked, hence the
spin_lock_irqsave().


> Except that we do get called with IRQs on and looking at that call of
> ghes_proc() at the end of ghes_probe(), that's a deadlock waiting to
> happen.
> 
> And that comes from:
> 
>   77b246b32b2c ("acpi: apei: check for pending errors when probing GHES entries")
> 
> Tyler, this can't work in any context: imagine the GHES NMI or IRQ or
> the timer fires while that ghes_proc() runs...

I thought this was safe because its just ghes_copy_tofrom_phys()s access to the
fixmap slots that needs mutual exclusion.

Polled and all the IRQ flavours are kept apart by the spin_lock_irqsave(), and
the NMIs have their own fixmap entry. (This is fine until there is more than
once source of NMI)


Thanks,

James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux