On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 07:13:24PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, 2018-05-14 at 17:40 +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote: > > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 03:48:09PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Mon, 2018-05-14 at 14:18 +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 04:15:47PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/apple-properties.c > > > > > +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/apple-properties.c > > > > > @@ -13,6 +13,9 @@ > > > > > + * FIXME: The approach is still based on union aliasing and > > > > > should be > > > > > + * replaced by a proper resource provider. > > > > > > > > Why? All Apple EFI properties are either boolean or u8 arrays. > > > > You've correctly changed this file to always supply u8 arrays, > > > > so I don't see where union aliasing is happening here? > > > > > > the implementation is quite fragile in this sense, because it > > > doesn't discourage people to use device_property_read_string() in > > > case when it's indeed a string (I saw these kind of properties in > > > the very dump you posted on your GH page). > > > > Well if that is your concern then you need to prevent functions which > > retrieve properties to use the wrong type. > > > > E.g. to prevent retrieval of the u8 array as string, you'd have to > > amend drivers/base/property.c:pset_prop_read_string_array() to > > check the type of the property found and return -EINVAL if it's not > > string. > > I think it's doable. I will hack a new version later this week. Ok, thanks for doing this. > But it still not a (best) solution for Apple properties. B/c as I told > already I saw in _your_ dump the _string_ properties. Someone might have > got an idea to use them as _strings_. That's kind of their problem then. ;-) The Apple EFI properties are untyped, so making them available as u8 arrays is the best we can do. If people need them as strings, they should retrieve as u8 array and convert that to string themselves. Kind regards, Lukas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
