Hi,
On 05/14/2018 12:50 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 05:25:10PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, April 26, 2018 2:10:23 PM CEST Hans de Goede wrote:
On some devices the contents of the ctrl register get lost over a
suspend/resume and the PWM comes back up disabled after the resume.
This is seen on some Bay Trail devices with the PWM in ACPI enumerated
mode, so it shows up as a platform device instead of a PCI device.
If we still think it is enabled and then try to change the duty-cycle
after this, we end up with a "PWM_SW_UPDATE was not cleared" error and
the PWM is stuck in that state from then on.
This commit adds suspend and resume pm callbacks to the pwm-lpss-platform
code, which save/restore the ctrl register over a suspend/resume, fixing
this.
Note that:
1) There is no need to do this over a runtime suspend, since we
only runtime suspend when disabled and then we properly set the enable
bit and reprogram the timings when we re-enable the PWM.
2) This may be happening on more systems then we realize, but has been
covered up sofar by a bug in the acpi-lpss.c code which was save/restoring
the regular device registers instead of the lpss private registers due to
lpss_device_desc.prv_offset not being set. This is fixed by a later patch
in this series.
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
Andy, Thierry, any comments or concerns regarding this series?
Hans said in the cover letter of the first version of this series that
he preferred to merge both patches through the PWM tree because of the
dependency. So I'm waiting for an Acked-by from you on the ACPI bits.
The other way around (both through ACPI) would work too, but yes it
would be good to keep them together,
Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
