Hi,
On 05/02/2018 03:24 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 4:46 PM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On 26/04/18 00:31, Jeremy Linton wrote:
Propagate the topology information from the PPTT tree to the
cpu_topology array. We can get the thread id and core_id by assuming
certain levels of the PPTT tree correspond to those concepts.
The package_id is flagged in the tree and can be found by calling
find_acpi_cpu_topology_package() which terminates
its search when it finds an ACPI node flagged as the physical
package. If the tree doesn't contain enough levels to represent
all of the requested levels then the root node will be returned
for all subsequent levels.
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
[..]
@@ -304,6 +345,8 @@ void __init init_cpu_topology(void)
* Discard anything that was parsed if we hit an error so we
* don't use partial information.
*/
- if (of_have_populated_dt() && parse_dt_topology())
+ if ((!acpi_disabled) && parse_acpi_topology())
[nit] not sure if extra () is need above,
No, it isn't.
but I am fine either way.
The redundant parens need to go away, really.
Yah, I missed this one, is there a linter everyone is using that finds
these?
Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
