On Thu 2018-04-26 13:20:57, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 03:39:51PM -0500, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
> > There seems to be a culture amongst BIOS teams to want to crash the
> > OS when an error can't be handled in firmware. Marking GHES errors as
> > "fatal" is a very common way to do this.
> >
> > However, a number of errors reported by GHES may be fatal in the sense
> > a device or link is lost, but are not fatal to the system. When there
> > is a disagreement with firmware about the handleability of an error,
> > print a warning message.
> > +
> > + if ((sev >= GHES_SEV_PANIC) && (ghes_actual_severity(ghes) < sev)) {
> > + pr_warn("FIRMWARE BUG: Firmware sent fatal error that we were able to correct");
> > + pr_warn("BROKEN FIRMWARE: Complain to your hardware vendor");
>
> Pasting the same comment from last time since you missed it:
>
> "No, I don't want any of that crap issuing stuff in dmesg and then people
> opening bugs and running around and trying to replace hardware.
We want to see warnings. Maybe they can be toned done. We even have
dedicated distros for firmware testing.
> Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Good mailing practices -- limit use of four letter words on public lists.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
