On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 1:31 AM, Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> ACPI 6.2 adds a new table, which describes how processing units
> are related to each other in tree like fashion. Caches are
> also sprinkled throughout the tree and describe the properties
> of the caches in relation to other caches and processing units.
>
> Add the code to parse the cache hierarchy and report the total
> number of levels of cache for a given core using
> acpi_find_last_cache_level() as well as fill out the individual
> cores cache information with cache_setup_acpi() once the
> cpu_cacheinfo structure has been populated by the arch specific
> code.
>
> An additional patch later in the set adds the ability to report
> peers in the topology using find_acpi_cpu_topology()
> to report a unique ID for each processing unit at a given level
> in the tree. These unique id's can then be used to match related
> processing units which exist as threads, within a given
> package, etc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@xxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/pptt.c | 518 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 518 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/pptt.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..cced71ef851a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,518 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * pptt.c - parsing of Processor Properties Topology Table
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2018, ARM
> + *
> + * This file implements parsing of Processor Properties Topology Table (PPTT)
> + * which is optionally used to describe the processor and cache topology.
> + * Due to the relative pointers used throughout the table, this doesn't
> + * leverage the existing subtable parsing in the kernel.
> + *
> + * The PPTT structure is an inverted tree, with each node potentially
> + * holding one or two inverted tree data structures describing
> + * the caches available at that level. Each cache structure optionally
> + * contains properties describing the cache at a given level which can be
> + * used to override hardware probed values.
> + */
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "ACPI PPTT: " fmt
> +
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/cacheinfo.h>
> +#include <acpi/processor.h>
> +
> +/**
> + * fetch_pptt_subtable() - Find/Verify that the PPTT ref is a valid subtable
The parens above are at least redundant (if not harmful). Everywhere
else in a similar context too.
Also kerneldoc comments document function arguments too as a rule, so
please do that here and wherever you use kerneldoc comments in the
patchset.
> + *
> + * Given the PPTT table, find and verify that the subtable entry
> + * is located within the table
> + *
> + * Return: acpi_subtable_header* or NULL
> + */
> +static struct acpi_subtable_header *fetch_pptt_subtable(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
> + u32 pptt_ref)
> +{
> + struct acpi_subtable_header *entry;
> +
> + /* there isn't a subtable at reference 0 */
> + if (pptt_ref < sizeof(struct acpi_subtable_header))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (pptt_ref + sizeof(struct acpi_subtable_header) > table_hdr->length)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + entry = ACPI_ADD_PTR(struct acpi_subtable_header, table_hdr, pptt_ref);
> +
> + if (entry->length == 0)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (pptt_ref + entry->length > table_hdr->length)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + return entry;
> +}
Apart from the above I'm not entirely sure why you need the changes in
patch [09/13] to go in a separate patch. All of them are new code
going into the file created by this patch, so why not to put them
here?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
