Hi, my attention was brought to the %subj commit and either I am missing something or the patch is quite dubious. What is it actually trying to fix? If a BIOS/FW provides more memblocks than the limit then we would get misleading numa topology (numactl -H output) but is the situation much better with it applied? Numa init code will refuse to init more memblocks than the limit and falls back to dummy_numa_init (AFAICS) which will break the topology again and numactl -H will have a misleading output anyway. So why is the patch an improvement at all? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
