Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/smpboot: Make the check code more clear in prefill_possible_map()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Peter,

At 03/20/2018 08:39 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 07:04:30PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
case 1: no  | no  | no | -->  min (setup_possible_cpus, nr_cpu_ids, setup_max_cpus)
case 2: no  | no  | yes| -->  min (setup_possible_cpus, nr_cpu_ids)
case 3: no  | yes | no | -->  1
case 4: no  | yes | yes| -->  1
case 5: yes | no  | no | -->  min (num_processors, nr_cpu_ids, setup_max_cpus)
case 6: yes | no  | yes| -->  min (num_processors + disabled_cpus, nr_cpu_ids)
case 7: yes | yes | no | -->  1
case 8: yes | yes | yes| -->  1

The case number is off by one ;-)


I got it! ;-)

Thanks
	dou




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux