On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 17:47 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2018, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 16:32 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > When fixing a regression, a good practice is to tag the fix commit
> > > as
> > > such:
> > >
> > > Fixes: 69c42d493db4 ("x86/pci: Simplify code by using the new
> > > dmi_get_bios_year() helper")
> >
> > Someone (perhaps Ingo) told me that Fixes doesn't make much sense if
> > the
> > fixing commit is not yet in vanilla.
>
> No. If the commit is already queued for the next merge window then a
> fixes
> tag is appropriate.
Thank you, Thomas, for clarification.
Will do this in v4.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
