Hi Lukas, >>>> We're quite far into the cycle already and this is a serious regression, >>>> also nothing of great value is lost by the revert, the original commit >>>> was a minor cleanup which turns out to have bad side-effects, a simple >>>> revert really is the best solution here, esp. in this point of the cycle. >>> >>> Just an hour ago he sent me the patch to look over it. And we're at >>> least two and a half weeks away from v4.16. >> >> No we are *only* two and a half weeks away from v4.16 (worst case scenario) >> and Linus does not like getting last minute fixes. > > That doesn't preclude allowing a few hours to discuss things. > There is never such a rush. In the present case, a new contributor > was willing to debug the issue and submit a patch. Onboarding new > contributors is important and IMO it's worth waiting a few days for > them to sort things out, even if it means a regression stays present > a little longer. I'm sorry that it meant you wasted time debugging > it in parallel. > > That said, when submitting the patch I clearly failed to notice that > for devices using autosuspend, pm_request_resume() doesn't update > the last usage timestamp. While that could be fixed by calling > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() before pm_request_resume(), it doesn't > seem to be customary as a look at all the call sites of > pm_request_resume() shows. The original three-line sequence, > although quite verbose, appears to be what is commonly used in such > a case. For this reason reverting back to the original version > seems justified. there is no reason to rush this through. With a properly worded commit message that explain the reason, I have no problem to do a last minute -rc inclusion. However what I like to have is a single patch with all Acks and also CC: stable tags if required that we can just send off in the direction towards Linus. I saw there is an alternative patch on the mailing list. So I would like to have a good conclusion on what goes to -rc and that we all agree. Regards Marcel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
