Hi Andy,
At 03/15/2018 01:24 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:28 PM, Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+static void __init acpi_update_possible_map(void)
+{
+ unsigned int cpu, nr = 0;
+
+ if (nr_cpu_ids <= nr_unique_ids)
+ return;
+
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ if (nr >= nr_unique_ids)
+ set_cpu_possible(cpu, false);
+ nr++;
+ }
IIUC this can be optimized to:
Yes, I agree, It's smarter and clearer. Will use it.
Thanks,
dou
if (nr_unique_ids >= nr_cpu_ids)
return;
/* Don't yet figure out if it's superfluous */
if (nr_unique_ids >= cpumask_last(cpu_possible_mask))
return;
for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpu_possible_mask, nr_unique_ids)
set_cpu_possible(cpu, false);
+ nr_cpu_ids = nr_unique_ids;
+ pr_info("Allowing %d possible CPUs\n", nr_cpu_ids);
+}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html