Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] x86, dmi: introduce and use dmi_get_bios_year()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >> I can apply this or if you want to route it differently,
> >
> > I don't know how to proceed here, Ingo applied v1 and there might be
> > options like remove old and reapply new, or do a series of fixups.
> >
> > Ingo, can you suggest how to do this in the best way?
> 
> AFAICS the tip workflow is that things are not rebased in there, only
> reverted if need be, and if the previous version was taken to tip,
> reverting it is not worth the hassle IMO.
> 
> I'd just wait for it to be integrated and post an update on top of it
> or even on top of linux-next.

Yeah, indeed, we rebase in -tip only if absolutely necessary - and there were no 
real problems with the v1 version, right?

So it would be nice to have v2 as a delta against what is already in -tip.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux