On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 04:06:13PM -0600, Jeremy Linton wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/include/linux/cacheinfo.h b/include/linux/cacheinfo.h
> index 0c6f658054d2..1446d3f053a2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cacheinfo.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cacheinfo.h
> @@ -97,6 +97,15 @@ int func(unsigned int cpu) \
> struct cpu_cacheinfo *get_cpu_cacheinfo(unsigned int cpu);
> int init_cache_level(unsigned int cpu);
> int populate_cache_leaves(unsigned int cpu);
> +int cache_setup_acpi(unsigned int cpu);
> +int acpi_find_last_cache_level(unsigned int cpu);
> +#ifndef CONFIG_ACPI
> +int acpi_find_last_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
This has got to be a static inline function declaration (see kbot report).
Lorenzo
> +{
> + /* ACPI kernels should be built with PPTT support */
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
>
> const struct attribute_group *cache_get_priv_group(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf);
>
> --
> 2.13.6
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
