Re: [PATCH 03/37] iommu/sva: Manage process address spaces

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/12/2018 1:33 PM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> +static void io_mm_free(struct io_mm *io_mm)
> +{
> +	struct mm_struct *mm;
> +	void (*release)(struct io_mm *);
> +
> +	release = io_mm->release;
> +	mm = io_mm->mm;
> +
> +	release(io_mm);

Is there any reason why you can't call iommu->release()
here directly? Why do you need the release local variable?

> +	mmdrop(mm);
> +}
> +


-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux