Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] ACPI / bus: Do not traverse through non-existed device table

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 4:59 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 3:56 PM, Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> When __acpi_match_device() is called it would be possible to have
>> ACPI ID table a MULL pointer. To avoid potential dereference,
>> check for this before traverse.
>>
>> While here, remove redundant 'else'.
>>
>> Cc: Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/acpi/bus.c | 12 +++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
>> index 761286e50067..da7e9cf770a6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
>> @@ -752,11 +752,13 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id *__acpi_match_device(
>>
>>         list_for_each_entry(hwid, &device->pnp.ids, list) {
>>                 /* First, check the ACPI/PNP IDs provided by the caller. */
>> -               for (id = ids; id->id[0] || id->cls; id++) {
>> -                       if (id->id[0] && !strcmp((char *) id->id, hwid->id))
>> -                               return id;
>> -                       else if (id->cls && __acpi_match_device_cls(id, hwid))
>> -                               return id;
>> +               if (ids) {
>> +                       for (id = ids; id->id[0] || id->cls; id++) {
>> +                               if (id->id[0] && !strcmp((char *)id->id, hwid->id))
>> +                                       return id;
>> +                               if (id->cls && __acpi_match_device_cls(id, hwid))
>> +                                       return id;
>> +                       }
>>                 }
>>
>>                 /*
>> --
>
> The return value below should be updated in *this* patch, because this
> is what allows ids to be NULL in the first place.
>
> And as far as I'm concerned you can do:
>
> if (!strcmp(ACPI_DT_NAMESPACE_HID, hwid->id)

Missing paren, sorry.

>         return (const struct acpi_device_id
> *)acpi_of_match_device(device, of_ids);
>
> and update the comment accordingly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux