Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] GHES: add a notify chain for process memory section

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 08:31:24PM +0800, Xie XiuQi wrote:
> Add a notify chain for process memory section, with
> which other modules might do error recovery.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Wang Xiongfeng <wangxiongfeng2@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  include/acpi/ghes.h      |  8 ++++++++
>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> index cff671d..1f0ebfb 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> @@ -109,6 +109,9 @@ static inline bool is_hest_type_generic_v2(struct ghes *ghes)
>  static LIST_HEAD(ghes_hed);
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(ghes_list_mutex);
>  
> +ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD(ghes_mem_err_chain);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ghes_mem_err_chain);

Definitely not EXPORT_SYMBOL.

And certainly not export the notifier head. Have register and unregister
functions instead.

That is, *if* you can't solve it differently with James. Notifiers
should be avoided if possible.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
-- 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux