On Sun, 2018-02-04 at 08:21 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 9:46 PM, Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 22:20 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > As well as its sibling of_device_get_match_data() has no such
> > > checks,
> > > no need to do it in acpi_get_match_data().
> > >
> > > First of all, we are not supposed to call fwnode API like this
> > > without
> > > driver attached.
> > >
> > > Second, since __acpi_match_device() does check input parameter
> > > there
> > > is
> > > no need to duplicate it outside.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 80212a162329 ("ACPI / bus: Introduce acpi_get_match_data()
> > > function")
> > > Cc: Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > rhaps I have to add that this conditional prevents
> > device_get_match_data() to work on PRP0001 devices AFAIU.
>
> Yes, please.
OK.
> I'm also not sure if the Fixes: tag is really applicable to this.
We can of course drop it, I put it here in a hope that this series would
be material to v4.16-rc2 to fix an introduced API.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
