On 2018-02-04 04:03, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:32 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 8:01 PM, Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Rafael,
On 1/16/2018 4:49 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 01:53:00PM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
Correcting linux-pci email.
On 1/16/2018 1:51 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
When ACPI Link object is enabled, the message is printed with a
warning
prefix. Some test tools are capturing warning and test error types
as
errors. Let's reduce the verbosity of success case.
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Looks like this was a result of 4d9391557b68 ("ACPI: add missing
KERN_*
constants to printks"), which I think added the wrong level in this
case.
Any chance of merging this for 4.16?
There is.
This one is already there in the Linus' tree AFAICS.
You are right. I see it there. I have not seen an applied email. I
thought it was still outstanding.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
