On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 4:43 PM, Andy Shevchenko >> <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 5:02 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 4:04 PM, Andy Shevchenko >>>> <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> Instead of declaring function as __weak, establish a new struct for >>> ACPI related stubs and incorporate it into x86_init. >>> >>> That is my proposal. I think I would go this way in my case where I >>> need to treat differently ACPI HW reduced initialization of legacy >>> devices. >> >> IOW you'd like to have a set of ACPI init callbacks that could be >> defined by an arch, right? > > Correct! OK -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
