2018-01-22 16:57 GMT+01:00 David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx> > Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 15:43:42 +0100 > >> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 09:35:25AM -0500, David Miller wrote: >>> From: Marcin Wojtas <mw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:00:37 +0100 >>> >>> > There's a discussion about the ACPI vs generic MDIO/PHY change under >>> > initial version of the patchset, however the patches in question were >>> > for now abandoned from further re-sends. >>> >>> But doesn't the results of that discussion determine whether the way ACPI >>> is being used in this patch series is what we want to do or not? >> >> Hi David >> >> The patches submitted here don't involve any ACPI for MDIO or PHY. It >> is all MAC. And it is using standard ACPI primitives for devices, >> nothing new. >> >> It is not setting any precedence for MDIO and PHY. That is totally out >> of scope for these patches. Whatever is decided for MDIO and PHY can >> be added later. > > Thanks for all of the clarifications. > > Series applied to net-next, thank you. Great, thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
