On Sat, 2018-01-13 at 12:53 +0100, Ognjen Galić wrote: > > -#include <linux/kernel.h> > > -#include <linux/module.h> > > -#include <linux/types.h> > > -#include <linux/jiffies.h> > > #include <linux/async.h> > > -#include <linux/dmi.h> > > #include <linux/delay.h> > > +#include <linux/dmi.h> > > +#include <linux/jiffies.h> > > +#include <linux/kernel.h> > > +#include <linux/module.h> > > #include <linux/slab.h> > > #include <linux/suspend.h> > > -#include <asm/unaligned.h> > > +#include <linux/types.h> > > These changes completely break my patch: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10142157/ > > Can we please postpone this patch until I hear back from Rafael > about my series, as my series does some of the things this patch > series does (like defining pr_fmt to shorten log prints) and this > is a much smaller changeset and would require small changes on > conflicts compared to my series? Definitely on both series we need to hear from Rafael. The usual approach, how I understand the process, the first pushed is first served, and a quite normal situation that the one, which had been send later, comes to repository first. But see above, we definitely rely on maintainer's decision here. P.S. AFAIU both series are rebased on top of linux-pm, correct? (At least I'm sure about this one) -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Intel Finland Oy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
