On Fri, 2018-01-12 at 14:24 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, January 5, 2018 5:09:32 PM CET Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > It appears that at least one current user (patch 3) and upcoming one > > (patch 2) need to get device name by ACPI HID. > > > > Here we introduce acpi_dev_get_first_match_name() based on code > > done for acpi_dev_present() and reuse it where appropriate. > > > > The series has been tested on Intel Edison with non-ACPI and > > ACPI enabled versions of U-Boot, while patches 1 and 3 were tested > > by Pierre. > > > > Since patch 1 and cross subsystem nature of the series I think > > the best way is to push this (patches 1 and 2) via Rafael's linux-pm > > tree. > > > > Taking into consideration that patch 3 requires not-yet-applied work > > from Pierre, I left it for reference, in particular to show the LOC > > statistics. > > > > Changelog v3: > > - add Pierre's tag (I dared to do this for both patches 1 and 3) > > - address comment about function name (patch 1) > > - add a reference to the first user (patch 1) > > - consolidate pin control device possible names in one place (patch > > 2) > > - rebase ASoC patch on not-yet-applied series from Pierre (patch 3), > > and > > - thus reordered to make it last in the series (patch 3) > > > > Andy Shevchenko (3): > > ACPI / utils: Introduce acpi_dev_get_first_match_name() > > gpio: merrifield: Add support of ACPI enabled platforms > > ASoC: Intel - Convert to use acpi_dev_get_first_match_name() > > > > drivers/acpi/utils.c | 41 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > > drivers/gpio/gpio-merrifield.c | 11 ++++++++- > > include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 3 +++ > > include/linux/acpi.h | 6 +++++ > > include/sound/soc-acpi.h | 7 ------ > > sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcht_da7213.c | 2 +- > > sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcht_es8316.c | 2 +- > > sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c | 2 +- > > sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5651.c | 2 +- > > sound/soc/intel/boards/cht_bsw_rt5645.c | 2 +- > > sound/soc/intel/boards/cht_bsw_rt5672.c | 2 +- > > sound/soc/soc-acpi.c | 33 ---------------------- > > ---- > > 12 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) > > [1-2/3] applied and I set up a git branch with them to pull from for > Mark. Thanks, Rafael! So, the roadmap is as I see the following: 1) Mark applies (if no objection) latest version of the second patch series from Pierre... 2) ...followed by PR from Rafael... 3) ...followed by the patch 3 from this series. Mark, does it sound like a plan to you? -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Intel Finland Oy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
