On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:18 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Monday, January 8, 2018 2:09:20 PM CET Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Sat, 2018-01-06 at 00:27 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 5:09 PM, Andy Shevchenko >> > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > > Sometimes the user wants to have device name of the match rather >> > > than >> > > just checking if device present or not. To make life easier for such >> > > users introduce acpi_dev_get_first_match_name() helper based on code >> > > for acpi_dev_present(). >> > > >> > > For example, GPIO driver for Intel Merrifield needs to know the >> > > device >> > > name of pin control to be able to apply GPIO mapping table to the >> > > proper >> > > device. >> > > >> > > To be more consistent with the purpose rename >> > > >> > > struct acpi_dev_present_info -> struct acpi_dev_match_info >> > > acpi_dev_present_cb() -> acpi_dev_match_cb() >> > > >> > > in the utils.c file. >> > > >> > > Tested-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > > m> >> > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > OK, so which way do you want this to go in? >> >> If you have no objections, patch 1 may go straight forward to linux-pm >> tree as far as you are okay with the contents. >> >> I dunno, if Mika's ACK is enough to you to get the second one (patch 2) >> together, otherwise Linus' ACK would be needed or leave it for next >> cycle. >> >> According to what Mark and Pierre told previously I guess we just >> postpone patch 3 for next cycle. > > OK > > Linus, can you please have a look at the [2/3] from this lot and let me know > whether or not I can take it? OK looking... Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
