On 03/01/18 14:21, Sudeep Holla wrote: > On 12/12/17 23:37, Jeremy Linton wrote: >> On 12/12/2017 05:02 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > [...] > >>> >>> So call this field "token" or similar. Don't call it "of_node" and >>> don't introduce another "firmware_node" thing in addition to that. >>> That just is a mess, sorry. > > I completely agree. Both me and Lorenzo pointed that out in previous > revisions and fair enough you have a valid concern it's use with PPTT. > >> >> I sort of agree, I think I can just change the whole of_node to a >> generic 'void *firmware_unique' which works fine for the PPTT code, it >> should also work for the DT code in cache_leaves_are_shared(). >> > > Should be fine. > Just to let you know, I don't have much to add. I will wait for the patches that replace of_node with firmware cookie or something similar. -- Regards, Sudeep -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
