Graeme, 2018-01-03 12:16 GMT+01:00 <graeme.gregory@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 08:23:54PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: >> > * Modify way of obtaining interrupts - with ACPI they are resources >> > bound to struct platform_device and it's not possible to obtain >> > them directly from the child node. Hence a formula is used, depending >> > on the port_id and number of possible CPUs. >> >> Hi Marcin >> >> I know nothing about ACPI. Is this limitation with respect to >> interrupts fundamental to ACPI, or just that nobody has implemented >> flexible interrupt support yet? >> > The infrastructure is there to traverse trees of children, but I don't > think there any helper functions. > Thanks, so if I implement such, do you expect any formal issues that prevent its acceptance? Best regards, Marcin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
