On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:07:30AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> Which is exactly why you've got this question at all. ;-) >> >> So you're saying, you've got your minions to do review for you - you can >> lay back and play all managerial now, huh? >> >> :-P >> >>> OK, let's queue it up for 4.16, then. >> >> Yeah, just keep an eye on reports of mapping errors... > > This appears to cause sparse to complain: > drivers/acpi/apei/apei-base.c:509:21: sparse: incorrect type in > argument 1 (different base types) > > It looks like that's a false-positive to me, though. Ah, OK It is not a false-positive. The argument of resource_size() is (const struct resource *) and res is of type (struct apei_res *). I'm dropping this one. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
