On Fri, 2017-12-15 at 01:58 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-12-07 at 11:03 +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > +static const struct x86_cpu_id cht_cpu[] = {
> > > + ICPU(INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_AIRMONT), /* Braswell, Cherry
> > > Trail */
> > > + {}
> > > +};
> >
> > I would rather to modify ICPU() macro to accept driver data where we
> > just pass an unsigned long value to be assigned as lpss_quirks and
> > introduce another quirk.
>
> Not really.
>
> There are many instances of ICPU() already in the tree and updating
> all of them is just not worth it.
These macros all over the code are local.
I'm talking about one which is defined inside acpi_lpss.c.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
