On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 12:45:50AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, December 12, 2017 4:59:19 PM CET Vadim Lomovtsev wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > While running LTP tests I've faced kernel crash caused by ltp_acpi test case. > > I have ACPI support enabled in kernel but kernel is boot with FDT having ACPI > > disabled. The ltp_acpi test case application is built along with ltp_acpi_cmds > > module to run ACPI tests. > > > > So my question is - should we update acpica implementation at kernel side by > > adding 'acpi_disabled' variable checking to the 'acpi_get_devices' function (see > > patch next to this email, maybe not a good approach) or this should be fixed at LTP > > side so the ltp_acpi_cmds should be updated in order to check if acpi is enabled > > before running tests ? > > There should be a check preventing acpi_get_devices() from being called in the > acpi_disabled case. In my case I have to update ltp_acpi code then. > > acpi_disabled is Linux-specific and the ACPICA code isn't, so the code calling > ACPICA functions should check acpi_disabled when necessary. Agree. However getting back to LTP tests it looks like such calls were implemented intentionally without checking of aspi_disabled value. Don't we have any self-testing stuff in acpica to prevent such scenarious ? WBR, Vadim > > Thanks, > Rafael > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
