On 08/12/17 08:05, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> In case the rsdp address in struct boot_params is specified don't try >> to find the table by searching, but take the address directly as set >> by the boot loader. >> >> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/acpi/osl.c | 8 ++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c >> index 3bb46cb24a99..3b25e2ad7d75 100644 >> --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c >> @@ -45,6 +45,10 @@ >> #include <linux/uaccess.h> >> #include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h> >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86 >> +#include <asm/setup.h> >> +#endif >> + >> #include "internal.h" >> >> #define _COMPONENT ACPI_OS_SERVICES >> @@ -195,6 +199,10 @@ acpi_physical_address __init acpi_os_get_root_pointer(void) >> if (acpi_rsdp) >> return acpi_rsdp; >> #endif >> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86 >> + if (boot_params.hdr.acpi_rsdp_addr) >> + return boot_params.hdr.acpi_rsdp_addr; >> +#endif > > Argh, that's typical short sighted hackery, layering violations and general > eyesore combined into a single patch ... > > Those #ifdefs are a disgrace, plus why should generic ACPI code include platform > details like boot_params.hdr/acpi_rsdp_addr? It's also not very extensible to > non-x86 - so someone will have to redo this work for ARM64 as well in the future > ... > > So how about doing it right: > > 1) > > Add a __weak acpi_arch_get_root_pointer() __weak function to drivers/acpi/osl.c: > > > __weak acpi_physical_address acpi_arch_get_root_pointer(void) > { > return 0; > } > > 2) > > use it in acpi_os_get_root_pointer(): > > ... > pa = acpi_arch_get_root_pointer(); > if (pa) > return pa; > ... > > 3) > > Override the default variant in x86's acpi.c via something like: > > acpi_physical_address acpi_arch_get_root_pointer(void) > { > return boot_params.hdr.acpi_rsdp_addr; > } > > 4) > > Add this to arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h: > > extern acpi_physical_address acpi_arch_get_root_pointer(void); > > 5) > > Add #include <asm/acpi.h> to drivers/acpi/osl.c. > > > That looks much cleaner, has no layering violations and is infinitely more > extensible, right? Right. Thanks for the very constructive comment. Juergen -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html