Re: [PATCH 2/2] acpi, x86: Use SPCR table for earlycon on x86

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 12/07/2017 01:46 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Prarit Bhargava <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> -int __init acpi_parse_spcr(bool earlycon)
>> +int __init acpi_parse_spcr(bool earlycon, bool enable_console)
>>  {
>>         static char opts[ACPI_SPCR_OPTS_SIZE];
>>         static char uart[ACPI_SPCR_BUF_SIZE];
>> @@ -113,7 +113,8 @@ int __init acpi_parse_spcr(bool earlycon)
>>         if (earlycon)
>>                 setup_earlycon(opts);
>>
>> -       err = add_preferred_console(uart, 0, opts + strlen(uart) + 1);
>> +       if (enable_console)
>> +               err = add_preferred_console(uart, 0, opts + strlen(uart) + 1);
> 
> So if earlycon==true but enable_console==false, then you parse SPCR
> and use it for the early console, but not the primary console?  I'm
> not sure what that gives you.
> 

On arm64 the original SPCR code provides both early and primary consoles (as
you've pointed out).  IOW, if SPRC exists on arm64 a console will be
initialized.  That is still the case after my change.

The expected behaviour on x86 is that unless someone specifies 'earlycon' or
'console=' that no console should be initialized.  There are users (some IOT
boxes, etc.) that do NOT want a console.

The above code keeps the existing x86 behaviour.

P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux