RE: [PATCH 00/11] ACPICA release 20170929

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: rjwysocki@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:rjwysocki@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rafael
> J. Wysocki
> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 2:42 PM
> To: Schmauss, Erik <erik.schmauss@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Moore,
> Robert <robert.moore@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] ACPICA release 20170929
> 
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 6:05 PM, Schmauss, Erik <erik.schmauss@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: linux-acpi-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-acpi-
> >> owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rafael J. Wysocki
> >> Sent: Monday, November 20, 2017 5:05 PM
> >> To: Schmauss, Erik <erik.schmauss@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Moore, Robert
> >> <robert.moore@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] ACPICA release 20170929
> >>
> >> Hi Erik,
> >>
> >> On Saturday, November 18, 2017 12:40:13 AM CET Erik Schmauss wrote:
> >> > This series of patches are from the 20170929 release of ACPICA.
> >> > This set is meant to be applied on top of the 20170831 ACPICA release.
> >> >
> >> > Bob Moore (4):
> >> >   ACPICA: Rename AE_AML_INFINITE_LOOP exception
> >> >   ACPICA: Tools: Deploy -vd option (build date/time) across all tools
> >> >   ACPICA: iASL/Tools: Add support for PDTT,SDEV,TPM2 ACPI tables
> >> >   ACPICA: Update version to 20170929
> >> >
> >> > Colin Ian King (1):
> >> >   ACPICA: Avoid null pointer dereference on Op.
> >> >
> >> > Erik Schmauss (3):
> >> >   ACPICA: Disassembler: reset parser_state's Aml pointer when parsing
> >> >     bad externals
> >> >   ACPICA: disassembler: getting rid of error message
> >> >   ACPICA: iASL: change processing of external op namespace nodes for
> >> >     correctness
> >> >
> >> > Jung-uk Kim (1):
> >> >   ACPICA: Fix an off-by-one error in acpi_get_timer_duration().
> >> >
> >> > Lv Zheng (2):
> >> >   ACPICA: Dispatcher: Introduce timeout mechanism for infinite loop
> >> >     detection
> >> >   ACPICA: Utilities: Cleanup style issue for bit clearing
> >> >
> >> >  drivers/acpi/acpica/acapps.h             |  3 ++
> >> >  drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h            |  2 +-
> >> >  drivers/acpi/acpica/dscontrol.c          | 18 ++++----
> >> >  drivers/acpi/acpica/hwtimer.c            | 29 ++++++------
> >> >  drivers/acpi/acpica/nsaccess.c           | 13 +++---
> >> >  drivers/acpi/acpica/nssearch.c           |  1 +
> >> >  drivers/acpi/acpica/psobject.c           | 10 +----
> >> >  drivers/acpi/acpica/psutils.c            |  6 +--
> >> >  drivers/acpi/acpica/utinit.c             |  1 -
> >> >  drivers/acpi/acpica/utmath.c             |  4 +-
> >> >  include/acpi/acconfig.h                  |  4 +-
> >> >  include/acpi/acexcep.h                   |  6 +--
> >> >  include/acpi/acpixf.h                    |  6 +--
> >> >  include/acpi/actbl1.h                    | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >> >  include/acpi/actbl2.h                    | 14 +++++-
> >> >  include/acpi/actypes.h                   |  2 +
> >> >  tools/power/acpi/tools/acpidump/apmain.c | 28 ++++++++++--
> >> >  17 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> Thanks for the patches.
> >>
> >> It doesn't look like anything in this series and in the next one you
> >> posted is particularly urgent, so I'm going to queue them up for 4.16.
> >>
> >> If there is anything is this material that should be included into
> >> 4.15, please let me know.
> > Hi Rafael,
> 
> Hi Erik,
> 
> > This 20170927 release was a small one and I believe that all of these
> > are not very urgent. However, changes to the NFIT table in the
> > 20171110 release has been requested by a few customers
> 

Hi Rafael,

> Well, I was asking about bug fixes rather as I'm not going to stretch the rules
> and fast-track new material that has only been posted after the opening of the
> merge window.
> 
> So let me rephrase: out of the fixes included in the two releases in question, is
> there anything urgent enough that it should be pushed for 4.15?

Thanks for the clarification. In this case, no. We don't have any fixes that are urgent enough to be pushed for 4.15.

Thanks,
Erik 
> 
> Thanks,
> Rafael
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux