> -----Original Message----- > From: Devel [mailto:devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rafael J. > Wysocki > Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 9:05 AM > To: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Wysocki, Rafael J <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>; Rafael J. Wysocki > <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; ACPI Devel Maling List <linux- > acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Jérémy Lefaure <jeremy.lefaure@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; > devel@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [Devel] [PATCH 15/18] acpi: use ARRAY_SIZE > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Colin Ian King > <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 03/10/17 12:39, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> On Tuesday, October 3, 2017 3:16:22 AM CEST Jérémy Lefaure wrote: > >>> On Mon, 02 Oct 2017 14:27:52 +0200 > >>> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>>> ACPICA is soewhat special code, though and I'm not taking or ACKing > >>>> patches for it directly as a rule. > >>>> > >>>> For one, I'm not sure if ACPICA can use ARRAY_SIZE at all. > >>> Why is it special code that can't use ARRAY_SIZE ? Is it because > >>> this macro is defined in linux/kernel.h ? > > > > However, ACPICA does have ACPI_ARRAY_LENGTH(x), see > > source/include/actypes.h > > Fair enough, but that cleanup should go in via ACPICA upstream anyway. [Moore, Robert] This would be acceptable, as long as it will work properly in the cases that were presented earlier (using ARRAY_SIZE). > > Thanks, > Rafael > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel@xxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.acpica.org/mailman/listinfo/devel ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
